|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 18:37:22 -0400, Nicolas George wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote in message <487e4670$1@news.povray.org>:
>> It's worked for software publishers for quite some time...
>
> I try avoid shareware as much as possible. Could you explain in what
> sense it "works"?
Shareware authors get their software included in magazines and such
fairly regularly - all that has to happen is the publisher asks
permission (or the author asks the publisher to include it on a
compilation disc).
I've seen this successfully used for many years. Personally, I don't
think it's too much to ask if the authors want to control distribution
that the publishers who want to include it ask for permission. After
all, if I (as a website owner) want to repurpose a Magazine's content,
I'm required by law to ask for permission unless I want to excerpt under
fair use. If I want to reproduce the content in its entirety, I MUST ask
permission.
Why should software be any different if the author chooses to follow this
standard convention?
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |